In this judgment a boy was murdered in by a close relative and at the end the court dismissed the appeal of accused because of his cruel and merciless killing of the victim. Kindly read this for gaining more information on the case.
Citation Name : 2011
SCMR 670 SUPREME-COURT
Side Appellant : GUL
MUHAMMAD
Side Opponent :
State
S.
302(b)---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Art. 40---Appraisal of evidence---Delay
in lodging of F.I.R. was suitably explained by the complainant, father of the
deceased child ---Complainant and accused were close relatives---Accused had
nourished ill will and grudge towards the complainant as he considered the
complainant responsible for separation of his wife and daughters and thus
thought of teaching a lesson to him---Medical evidence had supported the last
seen and other circumstantial evidence---Multiple circumstances had
corroborated the involvement of accused in killing the boy, who had taken him
along on a bicycle, killed him thereafter and thrown into the river---In view
of Article 40 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984, the lead provided by the accused
and pointation of the place where the minor was killed and recovery of dead
body, were all relevant informations about which only the accused had the
information---Accused had taken life of an innocent child in a merciless and cruel manner and he
deserved no leniency---Appeal was dismissed in circumstances.
No comments:
Post a Comment