Citation Name : 2011
PLC 942 SUPREME-COURT
Side Appellant :
DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER, DISTRICT DIR LOWER
Side Opponent : ROZI
KHAN
Art.
212(3)---termination /withdrawal of appointment of civil servant---Civil
servants, in the present case, were qualified and their appointments were made
by the competent authority after observance of due process of law---No proper
inquiry, such as issuing of charge-sheet/statement of allegations, show-cause
notice, had been issued to the civil servants while terminating/withdrawing
their services---Judgment of the Service Tribunal was based on valid and sound
reasons and was entirely in consonance with the settled law---Neither there was
misreading, nor misconstruction of facts and law was found in the said judgment
of Service Tribunal---Any irregularity, whatsoever, if committed by the
appointing department itself, the appointee could not be harmed, damaged or
condemned subsequently when it occurred to the department that it had itself
committed some irregularities qua any appointment---Petition for leave to
appeal by the department was dismissed by the Supreme Court, in circumstances.
No comments:
Post a Comment