Tuesday 24 April 2012

No descrimination for terminating employees service allowed under the law

Citation Name : 1996 PSC 181 SUPREME-COURT
SideAppellant: CHAIRMAN,PAKISTANINTERNATIONALAIRLINESCORPORATION,KARACHI
Side Opponent : SHERINDOKHTH
–Regln. 25—Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts. 25 & 185(3)-–Employees of P:IA. corporation —Retirement at the age of 45 years on sole ground of employee being a female—Validity of retirement challenged before High Court—High Court found that change pertaining to terms and conditions of service of employee to her disadvantage, could not be made in arbitrary manner and that employee’s retirement was a dear case of discrimination on basis of sex and sex alone and was, thus, violative of Arts. 25 & 27 of the Constitution—Validity–Leave to appeal was granted to consider whether employees of corporation were governed by Statutory Rules of Service and if so, whether Regln. 25, Pakistan International Airlines corporation Employees (Service and Discipline) Regulations, 1985, was discriminatory and militated against any of the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Contact Lawyers Network

If you have any queries related with this post you can contact at lawyergolra@gmail.com

Regards,
Salman Yousaf Khan
CEO
Lawyers Network
+92-333-5339880