Pages

Tuesday, 11 September 2018

2013 S C M R 587


Rule that no limitation ran against a void order was not an inflexible rule --- Party could not sleep over to challenge a void order and it was bound to challenge the same within the stipulated/Prescribed time period of limitation from the date of knowledge before the proper forum in appropriate proceedings --- Appeal filed before the Appellate Tribunal was admittedly time-barred, and was rightly dismissed as being hit by limitation and no sufficient cause for condonation of delay was found --- High Court agreed with the order of Appellate Tribunal --- Supreme Court had affirmed concurrent findings recorded by fora below --- Review petition was dismissed in circumstances.


For more, you can consult omara.khan789@gmail.com or call +923123450006

1 comment:

  1. These blogs are valuable because these are providing such informative information for all the people.
    stark law pllc

    ReplyDelete